home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Atari Mega Archive 1
/
Atari Mega Archive - Volume 1.iso
/
lists
/
gem
/
l_1199
/
1107
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-08-27
|
666b
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 17:51:26 -0400
From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
To: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
Subject: Pvfork()
Currently the kernel blocks the parent after a Pvfork(). Is there any
reason why this can't be changed? After all, these processes are
supposed to be running in the same address space after the Pvfork(),
and there doesn't seem to be much point in only letting one of them
run.
Any ideas?
-entropy
--
entropy -- it's not just a good idea, it's the second law.
Personal mail: entropy@gnu.ai.mit.edu
MiNT library mail: entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
"what do you have against octal?" -jrb